This blog takes apart the fake “security reports” and user-deceiving marketing put out by the SafeW / SafeX content farms — using public evidence and technical analysis to expose, point by point, how they deceive users.
When you search “is SafeW safe,” the “security reviews” and “security reports” near the top often aren’t neutral third parties — they’re SafeW itself. It has registered a cluster of look-alike domains — safews.cn, safew.org, safew-app.org, safew-im.com, and more — that keep publishing the same self-serving “security analysis,” flooding the first page of results so the first thing you see is SafeW vouching for SafeW.
Let’s be clear up front: a developer that plants information-stealing malware in its own app has zero credibility when it writes its own “security report.” When it claims to use Signal, claims to be end-to-end encrypted, claims to hold some international certification, you have no reason to believe any of it — none of it can be verified on a closed-source, packed binary, and all of it comes from an outfit already caught stealing user data. The only reason we go through it point by point below isn’t that its material counts as evidence; it’s that its own several stories can’t even keep each other straight.
One write-up says SafeW uses the Signal protocol; the other says Telegram. These are two incompatible designs, and the same app is described both ways — its “reports” say whatever they please, and not one of them can be relied on.